Re: why chat-does this constitute fraud
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by jufer
(199.182.33.146) on March 26, 2003 at 05:05:40:
In Reply to: Re: why chat-does this constitute fraud posted by LadynRed on March 25, 2003 at 18:29:13:
I (sent) cra there old credit report with original creditors tradeline. I included a new report showing re-aged collector's tradeline. CRA investigates re-aged trade-line, collector verify's. CRA"S keeps item.. What can I do? If the CA can't validate, then they can't 'verify' to the CRA's either, and the entries should be removed as inaccurate. Aren't they validating by electronically stating info should stay as reported?
If the CA has re-aged, and you have proof positive that it has been re-aged, its time to get tough with the CRA to make them correct the error.
I sent them there old cr report showing original creditor's tradeline. They cra's says it statys because the collector verified.. Now what?
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
