Re: Can anyone decipher BK reporting?
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Credit Forum Index ]
Posted by LadynRed
(199.91.33.254) on March 28, 2003 at 12:09:15:
In Reply to: Can anyone decipher BK reporting? posted by DDF on March 28, 2003 at 12:04:01:
The first one WFNNB, does say 'included in bankruptcy', but I believe it should NOT show any balance, as nothing is owed and the account was closed. The 2nd account, should say "included in bankruptcy', but the 0 balance is correct and and I believe the history from 97/98 can also stay. I would certainly dispute both of them - the first should show ZERO balance, included in bankruptcy. The 2nd should say 'included in bankruptcy'. Right now, it does not indicate that the debt was discharge, only that you filed. That means it could have been dismissed and that is not the case.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|
